NURS FPX 6011 Assessment 3 Implementing Evidence-Based Practice
NURS FPX 6011 Assessment 3 Implementing Evidence-Based Practice Student Name Capella University NURS-FPX6011 Evidence-Based Practice for Patient-Centered Care and Population Health Professor Name Submission Date Implementing Evidence-Based Practice In healthcare, evidence-based practice framework that combines practitioner expertise, patient values, and current research to guide clinical decisions. Internal Data shown that many of patient’s visit their doctor with physical complaints while they have underlying mental health issues which go unaddressed. The longer it takes to identify these mental health issues the worse the symptoms will be and the lower the quality of life for the patient. systematized methods of identifying patients who may have mental illness such as systematic screening and collaborative care model, implementing them routinely on a consistent basis. Therefore, this plan establishes, evidence-based research and implement that into practice to reduce the burden of mental illness through earlier detection and coordination of services within primary care using standardized tools verses just routine screenings. Background information on the clinical problem Depression is a major clinical issue affecting Black Americans mood, thought, and functioning which results in lower quality of life, increased health service utilization, and greater suicide risk. There are estimated to be over 280 million individuals who have been affected by depressive disorder world-wide thus making them one of the top causes of disability on a global basis, contributing substantially to years lived with disability (Santomauro et al., 2021). Further, there is strong evidence from systematic reviews conducted using data collected through primary care settings indicating that about 20% or one in five patients seen at primary care clinics experience some level of clinically relevant depressive symptomology and therefore remain undiagnosed without routine screening (Fekadu et al., 2022). The need for practice change arises due to the fact that most existing healthcare systems do not provide consistently applied screening, early detection methods, nor comprehensive treatments for depression, all of which contribute to delays in receiving appropriate care and subsequently poor patient outcomes. PICOT Question “Among Black American adults (P), how does the implementation of routine depression screening using the PHQ-9 tool (I) compare to usual care without standardized screening (C) in affecting the rates of early identification and referral for depression and anxiety (O) within a 3-month period (T)?” P (Population): Black American patients I (intervention): how does routine depression screening using the Patient Health Questionnaire – 9 (PHQ-9) tool C (Comparison): compared to usual care without standardized screening O (Outcome): improvement with early identification and referral for depression and anxiety T (Time): intervention duration is 3 months (12 weeks) Action plan for implementation The implementation timeline for Black Americans with depression recommendation is expected about 3 months. In the first 2 weeks the Project Team will have completed stakeholder meetings and communications, staff education/training, and assess existing screening practices for a Baseline Assessment (Ward et al., 2021). During weeks 3-5 the project team will implement changes to the work flow that include integrating PHQ-9 into the electronic health record (EHR), developing standardized referral processes. Weeks 6-10 are designated as the Pilot Phase during which time all eligible adult patients will receive a PHQ-9 screen, while continuously tracking completion rates, positives and referrals. Weeks 11-12 are designated as evaluation of outcomes, staff feedback collection & refining the process for full-scale implementation. Tools and Resources Intervention requires substantial resources including funding grants, trained healthcare staff, and mobile health technology platforms. The tools necessary to successfully implement intervention include a PHQ-9 Screening integrated with the EHR; clinical guidelines for interpreting results and clear pathways for behavioral health services. Combining other Complementary Tools may greatly increase accuracy, speed and concentration in Primary Care Settings (Cronkleton, 2023). Collectively, these tools provide alternatives for differing clinical situations, severity tracking, population specific screening, and comprehensive Mental Health Assessments resulting in improved overall detection and treatment of Depressive Disorders in Primary Care. Stakeholders Identification The stakeholders in intervention included psychologists, psychiatrists, nurse practitioner, physician assistant’s patients and their family. Psychologists’ health professionals are able to provide a diagnosis and treatment for clients based on referrals, nurses and medical assistants assist in administering screening, clinicians and administrative staff coordinate the workflow and allocate resources. Community organizations and faith leaders will partner in implementation and outreach efforts (Rosenthal et al., 2022). Opportunities for Innovation Developing opportunity for new innovations could be integrating the PHQ-9 into EHRs, so it can automatically score the client, and provide the practitioner with clinical decision support (Johnson & Stead, 2022). Another opportunity is utilizing Patient Portals/Digital Pre-Visit Screening. This would allow the practitioner to receive the results prior to the appointment, thereby reducing their work-load during the visit. Collaborative Care Models could also be developed. These types of innovations help increase detection and referral rates by streamlining processes, increasing efficiencies, and decreasing time required to identify potential cases of depression in primary care clinics. Potential Barriers and Action Several barriers may hinder the successful implementation of routine PHQ-9 screenings for depression. Key barrier to the successful implementation of routine PHQ-9 screenings for depression in primary care consist of limited consultation times with providers, lack of adequate education/training of staff, providers, lack of willingness by providers to make workflow adjustments, lack of access to mental health services, including but not limited to psychologists, technological limitations with electronic health records (EHR) systems and reluctance on the part of patients to report their symptoms (Blake, 2022). In order to successfully implement and sustain the use of routine PHQ-9 screenings for depression in primary care it will be important to provide education, training to staff and providers to develop methods for integrating workflow and improve access to mental health services. Outcomes Criteria Effectiveness evaluation of the PHQ-9 screening project is the process of evaluating the success of this project will begin with a collection of baseline information regarding what is currently done at the clinic to screen for depression, rate at which mental health referrals are made from the clinic, how long it takes to complete a mental health referral, and if there is an existing trend or pattern
